In its latest reporting of a so-called leaked climate assessment the New York Times relies on exaggerated statements and false allegations of cover-ups in order to push an agenda. However, US scientists' findings recorded in the draft report nail Trump's lies.
Even as Trump, who thinks climate change is about whether he'll catch a sunny day for golf at Mar-a-Lago, shrugs off the truth.
Kopp, the Rutgers University scientist, said Tuesday afternoon that The Times updated the online story to post a newer draft, the Fifth Order Draft, which is now under review. (Whenever the Trump team uses "hoax", understand we are dealing with an unassailable set of facts it desperately wants to deny.) For now, the White House is stalling, declining to comment until the report is finalized and officially released. It projects a near-term rise of temperature in the U.S. by 2.5 degrees F (1.4 degrees C). For example, a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees to 2 degrees Celsius could cause more intense rainstorms, longer heat waves and lead to more rapid deterioration of coral reefs, scientists say. On the flip side, droughts and heat waves have been more common in other parts of the USA, they add. Alaska is uniquely "on the front lines" of climate change - and residents can already attest to accelerated melting of ice and glaciers, eroding shorelines, and higher temperatures in "the Last Frontier". The field known as "attribution science" has advanced rapidly in response to increasing risks from climate change.
"It's a fraught situation", said Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geoscience and worldwide affairs at Princeton University who was not involved in the study. The scientists who worked on it clearly wanted to make sure their findings weren't bottled up or rewritten by the climate change deniers who populate Trump's administration.
"Evidence for a changing climate abounds, from the top of the atmosphere to the depths of the oceans", a portion of the study reads.
The Trump administration could do the country, the GOP and the conservative movement an enormous favor by simply acknowledging scientific reality. At the same time, heavy precipitation events in the US have increased in both intensity and frequency since the beginning of the 20 century - especially for the Northeast. Still, it notes, crucial uncertainties remain. But the authors say there is now relatively strong evidence for a human contribution to events such as the heat waves in Europe in 2003 and in Australia in 2013.
The report goes on to state that "many lines" of scientific evidence "demonstrate that it is extremely likely" (meaning 95-100% certain) "that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century".
- YouTube Gets In-App Messaging Feature
- Tropical Storm Franklin could become hurricane before Mexican landfall
- Dayton calls Islamic center explosion an 'act of terror'
- England win to secure 3-1 series victory over SA
- Talent Not an Issue for England's New Manager
- Lawyer says Taylor Swift had no reason to lie about groping
- Defensive star Wilfork announces retirement in Twitter ad
- Klitschko faces must-win bout against Fury
- Chester Bennington's wife to decide if Carpool Karaoke episode will go ahead
- Tesla Lowers Starting Price of Model X