ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS (NYSE:ETP) Noteworthy Mover

Thursday, 19 Oct, 2017

According to their observations and findings, the stock could provide a high EPS of $0.65/share and a low EPS of $0.04/share. Stock has a payout ratio of 466.70%. In general, companies with the lowest combined rank may be the higher quality picks. This figure represents the amount of revenue a company generates per dollar of assets. Stifel Nicolaus initiated coverage on shares of Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.in a research report on Thursday, July 13th. The company moved in the past week with shift of -0.84%.

How Company Returns Shareholder's Value? Energy Transfer Equity has recorded a 50-day average of $17.60 and a two hundred day average of $17.68. Jefferies maintained Energy Transfer Partners LP (NYSE:ETP) on Monday, August 28 with "Buy" rating. Value of 45.00000. The Q.i. The goal of the Q.i. Moving averages can be very helpful for identifying peaks and troughs. Typically, the lower the value, the more undervalued the company tends to be. Days to cover decreased -2.0 to 3.0 and the percentage of shorted shares was 0.01% on September 29. Steinberg Glob Asset Mngmt accumulated 24,300 shares or 0.07% of the stock. Whether a stock is in or out of their favor can have a big effect on its price.

Covering sell-side analysts have recently weighed in on shares of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (NYSE:ETP). The name now has a score of 25.00000. Among this group of ratios is the turnover to capital employed or return on investment (ROI) ratio. The value in dollars decreased from $3,584,000 to $2,222,000 a change of $1,362,000 quarter to quarter. It is negative, as 340 investors sold Energy Transfer Partners LP shares while 5 reduced holdings. The score may also be used to spot the weak performers. A single point is assigned to each test that a stock passes. Morgan Stanley reinitiated the stock with "Equal-Weight" rating in Monday, August 15 report. Nbw Cap Ltd accumulated 421,512 shares or 2.1% of the stock. The Company dividend yield observed at 2.12%. This is calculated by taking weekly log normal returns and standard deviation of the share price over one year annualized.

Looking forward, the company's quarterly earnings are expected to come at $1.2 in the three months through September 2017 and $1.21 in the quarter ending December 2017, reflecting 242.86% and 55.13% growth, respectively. Over a month, it has seen its stock price volatility to stay at 1.89% while shortening the period to a week, volatility was 1.78%. Energy Transfer Partners had 58 analyst reports since August 10, 2015 according to SRatingsIntel. The Volatility 6m is the same, except measured over the course of six months.

Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.'s ROA is now valued at 0.30% * with a ROI value of 1.50% *. The firm has a market cap of $19.16 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 22.38 and a beta of 1.90.

The TTM operating margin for the company stands at 4%. The employed capital is calculated by subrating current liabilities from total assets. The Fund's investment portfolio consists of investment companies, common stocks, commodity partnerships, preferred stocks, money market funds, corporate notes, liquidating trusts, corporate bonds, promissory notes, senior unsecured notes, warrants and rights. Westwood Holdings Group Inc. raised its position in Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.by 92.3% in the second quarter. Accordingly, the company shows a 144.90% EPS growth for the subsequent year and computes the EPS growth for the past five years at -4.30% *. Royal Bank Of Canada reaffirmed a "buy" rating and set a $22.00 price objective on shares of Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.in a research report on Wednesday, September 6th.

There are many different tools to determine whether a company is profitable or not. A P/B ratio of less than 1.0 can indicate that a stock is undervalued, while a ratio of greater than 1.0 may indicate that a stock is overvalued. As a result, Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. attained a Profit Margin of 0.70% *. A company that manages their assets well will have a higher return, while a company that manages their assets poorly will have a lower return.